ShockeNizer

Min lilla setup
 
CPU: Intel i5 2500k 3.30 GHz
GPU: ASUS GeForce GTX 970
RAM: Corsair Vengeance 8GB DDR3 1600Mhz CL9 + Corsair Vengeance 8GB DDR3 1600Mhz CL9  (Totalt, 16GB)
Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V Pro/GEN3 
SSD: Kingston HyperX 3K SSD 120GB 
  HDD: Western Digital 7200rpm 1TB
PSU: OCZ Thechnology 500W ModXStream
Case: NZXT Phantom 410 - White
OS: Windows 7 Home Premium SP1 64bit
 
Datorstol: AKRACING Premium 
Keyboard: Razer Blackwidow Chroma
Mouse: Steelseries Rival, 450Dpi
Mousepad: Steelseries NiP edition
Screen: 3st, BenQ 60Hz 22 tum & Philips TV 42tum
Headset: Razer Tiamat 2.2
 
 

Snacka om att hindra yttrandefrihet. Jag tycker det är riktigt fjantigt att banna folk när de försöker hjälpa till här på forumet. Det verkar gå lite åt fel håll känner jag. (banna mig för min post om ni känner för det)

This issue was resolved between Arre and Shockinizer. much rejoice, the mature way to go!
He is now unbanned.
 
 
I also got alot of attention/pms regarding this ban specifically.
In the evidence supplied (in this thread and via PM's) it was clear that it was 2 different situations placed far between, and the 2 aggressors died and there was no one to carry the word forward (new life). if the evidence had showed a firefight with multiple gangmembers and some of them survive, then they can continue fighting for 15min as "All gangs under same tag"-rule and "in combat"-rules applies. But this was judge on evidence supplied and there was no indication/mentioning that there was surviving gangmembers that travled to destination x.